‘How Objects Fall’ and ‘Gill’s Electronic Theory of Magnetism 1964’
Citation: Avtar Singh Gill, MD. “‘How Objects fall’ and ‘Gill’s electronic theory of magnetism 1964’”, American Research Journal of Physics, vol 5, no. 1, pp. 1-38.
Abstract
Abstract: Applying Gill’s electronic theory of magnetism (1964) to planet Earth and relating it to the
electron dependent negative force (-e) and the proton dependent positive force (+e) of atoms of any
object close to the surface of the Earth, it will be explained mathematically how objects close to the
Earth fall towards the Earth with a combination of these two forces.
In the northern and southern magnetic hemispheres of the Earth, equations based on known physics
laws are offered for objects falling towards the Earth.
Dot-product vector equations will explain why a pendulum will accelerate least at the equator and
this lateral acceleration keeps on increasing as we move the same pendulum from the equator
towards the magnetic poles of the Earth as has been seen experimentally.
As the object O gains height above the surface of the Earth, the two negative and positive extraterrestrial forces become effective and O starts losing weight with increasing height.
At a certain greater height above the Earth where the two negative and positive forces from the
Earth balance with the two negative and positive extra-terrestrial forces, the object O will start
behaving as a satellite. The bigger object O will become a satellite at a greater height.
A brief discussion at the end on why this presentation is more accurate as compared to Sir Isaac
Newton’s universal law of gravitation which resulted in the incorrect third force concept of gravity
in the Physics world in 1687.
As the asymmetry between the magnetic force and the electrical forces is resolved with Gill’s
electronic theory of magnetism 1964, Albert Einstein’s ‘Special theory of relativity 1905’ which was
presented to deal with the asymmetry issue becomes unnecessary along with his ‘General Relativity
theory 1916’ where he tries to justify the gravitational force.
