American Research Journal of Pathology        cover
Open Access

American Research Journal of Pathology

ISSN (Online):

DOI: 10.46568/arjpl

Research Article Vol. 1, Issue 1 2025 Open Access

Lack of Significant Co-Activation of BKV and CMV in Renal Transplant Patients: An Institutional Experience

Minh-Thu Nguyen, BS1, Phylicia Gawu, MS2, Leon Li Tung, MD3, Zhen Yang, MS4, Lynn Soong, MD, PhD5, and Jianli Dong, MD, PhD4

1 School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA 2 William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, MS, USA 3 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA 4 Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA 5 Departments of Microbiology & Immunology and Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston,TX,USA 
Citation: Minh-Thu Nguyen, BS, Phylicia Gawu, MS, Leon Li Tung, MD, Zhen Yang, MS, Lynn Soong, MD, PhD, Jianli Dong, MD, PhD, “Lack of Significant Co-Activation of BKV and CMV in Renal Transplant Patients: An Institutional Experience”. American Research Journal of Pathology; 1(1): 1-6
Abstract
Abstract: BK virus (BKV) is a significant contributor to renal allograft dysfunction due to its prevalence in immunocompromised transplant patients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is also common in the same group. Since both BKV and CMV are ubiquitous infections and reactivation of both viruses can occur in immunosuppressed states, such as renal transplantation, we performed a retrospective analysis of BKV and CMV co-activation in renal transplant patients. Between January 2013 and December 2014, 222 renal transplant patients were tested for BKV and CMV using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory at The University of Texas Medical Branch in Texas. Assessment of CMV viral load was performed using plasma samples, while BKV viral load was assessed in both plasma and urine samples. We found that 53 patients (26.6%) were positive for BKV, 10 patients (7.2%) were positive for CMV, 6 patients (2.7%) were positive for co-reactivation, and 153 patients were negative for both viruses (68.92%). There was no significant association between BKV and CMV co-activation in renal transplant patients.